Why are approval delays so costly?
Because they slow down projects, frustrate staff, and reduce finance’s credibility as a partner to the business.
What causes the delays?
Bottlenecks in email approvals, unclear policies, and manual oversight that doesn’t scale.
How can CFOs fix it?
By shifting to automated, rule-based workflows in expense management systems that approve routine spend instantly and escalate only exceptions.
Approval delays don’t always show up on financial statements — but they erode performance daily.
For CFOs, the real cost isn’t just wasted time. It’s lost trust.
Delays often happen because:
What begins as a control measure ends as a bottleneck.
Approval bottlenecks create:
Time isn’t just money — it’s momentum.
A national services business found that managers were waiting up to two weeks for finance approvals on routine expenses. Delays derailed projects and damaged relationships with suppliers.
After moving to bill payment software with automated workflows:
The CFO shared: “We didn’t lose control — we gained speed and respect.”
Beyond efficiency, delays create a cultural drag:
These frustrations compound into disengagement and loss of confidence.
CFOs can restore flow by:
This approach balances control with agility.
Why are approval delays so damaging?
Because they waste time, frustrate staff, and erode finance’s credibility.
How do automated approvals help?
They approve spend within limits instantly, reducing delays without losing oversight.
What’s the risk of manual approvals?
Bottlenecks, missed opportunities, and staff bypassing controls.
Can automation still enforce policies?
Yes — rules are applied automatically at the point of spend.
What’s the cultural benefit?
Employees feel trusted, and finance is seen as an enabler, not a blocker.
Approvals shouldn’t hold the business back. With automation, finance enables momentum while maintaining control.
The reflective question: is your approval process protecting the business, or slowing it down?